The research result indicating that more than 60 percent of the community outside the Tigray region is willing to amend the constitution can be highly valuable for the work of the National Consultation Commission. Here’s why:
- Public Opinion Representation: The research result provides a quantitative measure of public opinion regarding the amendment of the constitution. With a significant majority in favor of the amendment, it suggests a widespread sentiment within the community.
- Basis for Decision-Making: The research result offers a concrete data point for the Commission to consider during their review process. It provides an empirical foundation that can guide their decision-making regarding the need for constitutional amendments.
- Informed Decision-Making: The Commission’s commitment to conducting a thorough review by considering data from multiple sources, including scientific research and studies, demonstrates their dedication to making informed decisions. The research result can contribute to the Commission’s overall understanding of public sentiment and aid them in reaching a well-rounded conclusion.
- Transparency and Accountability: By acknowledging the importance of studying and disclosing scientific research and studies to the community, the Commission emphasizes transparency and accountability. Sharing the research result with the public ensures that the decision-making process is open and inclusive, fostering trust and participation from the community.
Overall, the research result can serve as a significant input for the National Consultation Commission’s work by providing valuable insights into the community’s views on constitutional amendments. It helps ensure that the Commission’s decisions are informed, transparent, and reflective of the sentiments of the majority of the population.